Tender monitoring
Procurement sites are walked on a schedule, and new notices pass filters on niche, region and value. The ones that fit arrive in a chat with the deadline and the documents.
- Buildfrom $1,400
- Timeline1–3 weeks
- Supportfrom $420/mo
Who this suits: Companies searching several procurement sites by hand, finding half the suitable notices just before the deadline and spending more effort on weeding out than on the bid.
What is in the first version
- procurement sites
- filters and stop-words
- notice with documents
- alerts and deadlines
The figures above are the package this sits on: Parsing and reverse engineering. Anything past its edges the calculator adds before the work starts, not after.
How the path goes
- 01
A new notice appears
A pass takes what is new, documents included: the substance sits in the attachments, not the heading or classifier code.
- 02
Cutting matters more than searching
Stop words, value limits and requirements you fail take away more than keywords add, and what was cut stays visible.
- 03
What fits arrives with its deadline
One message: subject, buyer, value, closing date and link, and the decision is recorded there, which corrects the filter.
What decides whether this works or annoys people
The heading hides the subject
The heading and classifier code belong to the buyer’s reporting, so parsing reaches the documentation and doubtful notices queue for a person.
A change matters more than publication
Deadlines and requirements change after publication, so a notice you take up stays watched and an edit arrives as its own message.
A wide filter kills the subscription
A flow nobody reads makes a missed tender look like no tenders, so daily volume is a metric from day one.
What to measure once it is live
- suitable notices found without hand searching
- share of alerts marked not your work
- time from publication to your alert
- changes caught before the bid goes in
Why this comes out faster
The shape of this one is known: the states, the edge cases and the things that usually go wrong have been decided before. Nothing here is a template, and the saving is not in your half of the work. It goes into your process, your content and the systems this has to talk to, which is the part nobody can have solved in advance.
A likely stack for this
Picked against the task when we scope it, not decided in advance. This is the shelf it usually comes off.
- Collection and documentsPythonPlaywrightFastAPIS3Docker
- Selection and searchPostgreSQLpgvectorOpenAIAnthropicRedis
- Schedule and alertsn8nTemporalTelegram Bot APIGrafana
Price it yourself, right here
Five steps, and you can see the number without leaving a contact. The estimate accounts for the kind of work, what you already have and what it will need inside.
These bills do not come from us
- electronic signature and accreditation on the sites
- paid access to sites and aggregators
- AI model calls over the documentation
- hosting and storage for downloaded documents
Asked before the first call
- Which sites do you support?
- The list is agreed before the estimate: official export where it exists, the page where it does not. If a site cannot be read or its terms forbid it, we say so before the price.
- Will it submit the bid for us?
- No. The system brings the notice and documents to a person and stops: a bid goes in under your signature. A draft from a template is a separate line in the estimate.
- Why is this better than a paid aggregator?
- Often it is not, and we will say so: if your selection fits their filters, pay them, it is cheaper. Your own makes sense when selection rests on the documentation and your own rejections.